Eu-Acp Partnership Agreement

Within the EU and the ACP countries, a great divergence of views has emerged on the continuation of the partnership. As the Cotonou end date slowly approaches, increasingly critical questions are being asked about the benefits and effectiveness of partnership in a world that has changed so much over the past two decades. The ACP-EU Council of Ministers is the highest institution of the ACP-EU partnership. It meets once a year in Brussels and in an ACP country and meets: negotiations with the countries of the Southern African Development Community were also successfully concluded in July 2014. The agreement was signed in Kazan, Botswana, on 10 June 2016. It entered into provisional application on 10 October 2016. Relations between the European Union (EU) and the ACP group changed considerably during the 1990s. Historical ties, which were the most defining features of previous agreements, had been eroded and the importance of ACP countries to the EU had been reduced. Faced with the completion of the internal market programme in 1992 and the end of the Cold War, the EU turned to development issues that were a little closer to home, namely in Central and Eastern Europe.

Although EU-ACP relations have continued, they have been marked by the political developments of their time. The wave of democratization that affected many developing countries after the end of the cold war led to a hitherto unknown politicization of development cooperation. In addition, the continuing lack of economic benefits expected by Lomé, its continued incompatibility with the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the complexity of the Lomé Agreements were the reasons why a new agreement was drawn up in Cotonou, the capital of Benin. Does the Cotonou Agreement adequately reflect the shift from aid-dominated modalities to mutually beneficial partnerships? Can it be reconciled with the new 2030 agenda, which aims to break with traditional North-South agreements? Did the current agreement provide what he wanted? Would separate partnerships between the EU and the three ACP regions be more effective considering that Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific, as regions, have changed so much and are geographically so diverse and distant from each other? These are essential questions, but they have long been neglected and unanswered. .


Artículos Relacionados